Comments for writing and scriptwriting

Comment on So, what else is hype? by Nanako

Nanako — Sun, 26 Jul 2009 00:24:35 +0000

its the way they cover the stories on the news, giving more spotlight and importance to what the bigger ignorant population wants than whats really right and whats a fact that NEEDS to be heard…

Comment on U.K news, the reality of reality TV by So, what else is hype? « writing and scriptwriting

So, what else is hype? « writing and scriptwriting — Sat, 23 May 2009 12:35:48 +0000

[...] U.K news, the reality of reality TV [...]

Comment on About sums it up by coolynooly69

coolynooly69 — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 16:52:32 +0000

Thanks for your comment. Well, I have worked in various capacities within photography for fifteen odd years and have a website that features my work http://www.2rightfeet.com which, hopefully, indicates that I have some knowledge of photographic process. My feeling is that the process has changed: Much is achieved after the image has been “photographed” rather than in the moments leading up to it. If you look at chemical based photography then aperture selection, exposure, lens choice, film stock choice and processing decisions, etc, were the creative factors and it could be argued that more skill was required as it was a predictive process rather than the adaptive process undertaken in digital manipulation of imagery. There were always post-shutter techniques and darkroom skills that could enhance or alter the information captured by the camera but that has become almost the sole part of the creative process if digital photography is considered to now be the norm.

As I said, good or bad…it is just progress, but are the majority of photographers really drawing with light or just becoming skilled at post-production image manipulation. I am not some mad Luddite claiming digital technology is the work of the devil, I went from partially digital to fully digital over the last few years and though reasonably skilled and experimental in the darkroom I was never a big fan of the smell of the chemicals and all the cleaning that went with it.

Comment on About sums it up by yesbuts

yesbuts — Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:23:19 +0000

So a “Photographer” doesn’t exist anymore.

Lets have some details to support your prognoses.

In the meantime I’ll keep posting photographs on my blog, to prove photography is alive and well and flourishing.

Comment on InsideOut: London, October 23rd 2007 by 466 Million reasons for the RLHH. « writing and scriptwriting

466 Million reasons for the RLHH. « writing and scriptwriting — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:56:55 +0000

[...] such as the one featured a few months back, on BBC1’s London InsideOut programme roll out the argument that convential medicine undergoes strict trials, test, reviews and [...]

Comment on Jekyll: An interpretation. Part three by coolynooly69

coolynooly69 — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 17:03:41 +0000

Thanks for your comment. I did try to submit to the site but it was closed to submissions

Comment on Jekyll: An interpretation. Part three by jo

jo — Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:49:29 +0000

You should have submitted the last Jekyll post to the BBC Jekyll homepage. The Claire character does seem to have an increasingly important role to play.

I agree that this is great drama but I think there is wuite a bit of quality drama out there if you look for it, though one must admit a lot of it is imported from the U.S.

Comment on Jekyll: An interpretation. Part one by Jekyll & Hyde. part two « Grail_Questing

Jekyll & Hyde. part two « Grail_Questing — Sun, 08 Jul 2007 21:30:32 +0000

[...] and adapted to address contemporary issues, which will lead me on to Steven Moffat’s Jekyll. Link Posted by coolynooly69 Filed in [...]